<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Office Hierarchy - sorted by Dolores</title>
	<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/</link>
	<description>Fine graphs and cynicism fuelled by idiocy in TV, politics, celebrity and business</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Mayle</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-427</link>
		<author>Jake Mayle</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 09:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-427</guid>
					<description>the triangle lives. 

it's great obviously. A bottle of Gordon's does wonders for the creative juices..

My only comment would be to try and get a sense of scale in each tier...

i suspect that the 'people with no life' tier occupies 60 - 70% of the triangle.

but i'm picking holes in what's clearly a major piece of work by one of Ploop's stalwarts.

i really must knock up a diagram of my own soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the triangle lives. </p>
<p>it&#8217;s great obviously. A bottle of Gordon&#8217;s does wonders for the creative juices..</p>
<p>My only comment would be to try and get a sense of scale in each tier&#8230;</p>
<p>i suspect that the &#8216;people with no life&#8217; tier occupies 60 - 70% of the triangle.</p>
<p>but i&#8217;m picking holes in what&#8217;s clearly a major piece of work by one of Ploop&#8217;s stalwarts.</p>
<p>i really must knock up a diagram of my own soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploop</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-428</link>
		<author>ploop</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 10:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-428</guid>
					<description>we're waiting for you jake - although your macho stars will be a regular sometime soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;re waiting for you jake - although your macho stars will be a regular sometime soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolores</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-430</link>
		<author>Dolores</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 11:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-430</guid>
					<description>Thanks for promoting me to stalwart, Jake! Is there management buy-in on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for promoting me to stalwart, Jake! Is there management buy-in on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Eat Snowman Poop</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-431</link>
		<author>I Eat Snowman Poop</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-431</guid>
					<description>I think that graph explains it perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that graph explains it perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qelqoth</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-436</link>
		<author>Qelqoth</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-436</guid>
					<description>Yet again, more proof that I am at the lower rung of the ladder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again, more proof that I am at the lower rung of the ladder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolores</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-437</link>
		<author>Dolores</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-437</guid>
					<description>All the best ones are. Which category do you fall into, Qelgoth? I'm guessing genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the best ones are. Which category do you fall into, Qelgoth? I&#8217;m guessing genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qelqoth</title>
		<link>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-441</link>
		<author>Qelqoth</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.plooptionary.com/2007/05/09/the-office-hierarchy-sorted-by-dolores/#comment-441</guid>
					<description>Struggling genius?  Nah, too cliche.  I'd rather be at the top of the chain, wrenching the beating organs out of the chests of overweight conglomerates and shoving them right down their screaming throats until they choke.

...I'm hornee now.  Ne gurls wanna fuk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Struggling genius?  Nah, too cliche.  I&#8217;d rather be at the top of the chain, wrenching the beating organs out of the chests of overweight conglomerates and shoving them right down their screaming throats until they choke.</p>
<p>&#8230;I&#8217;m hornee now.  Ne gurls wanna fuk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
